Can we trust the citations?

Citations can be wrong in a way that passes inspection: the source exists, is real, is topically relevant, and does not actually say what the answer claims. Readers verify that the link opens rather than that the passage supports the sentence, so a plausible mis-citation survives review more easily than an obvious fabrication.

Retrieval in Centralpoint draws from governed records with stable identifiers and version history, so a citation resolves to the version the answer derived from rather than to today's text. The Interaction Log retains the retrieved set per execution, which means a disputed attribution is checkable against what the system actually had rather than against a re-run returning different material.