Controlled Change Governance

Every revision raises the same question: is this material. Fixing a typo plainly is not; altering a threshold plainly is; most changes sit between. Without a stated rule the judgement is made by whoever is editing, under deadline, and the organization ends up with substantive amendments published under an approval granted for something else. A controlled regime names the change classes, attaches a re-approval requirement to each, and accepts that some borderline cases will be escalated rather than decided locally.

Because version history in Centralpoint is a property of the record and approval attaches to a specific version, a change made after approval is visibly a change made after approval rather than absorbed into the document. Governance-tier skills can require escalation where an AI-assisted edit touches a category the organization has designated material, so automation does not quietly become the thing that decides what counts as minor.